If with a normal distribution we assume generally most people live an average similar lifespan, or even limited in the maximum possible years one can reside.
Why do some people achieve exponential amounts of growth (can take different forms), whilst others just pass life by, given they have the same time...?
A broader (philosophical) question; does society need to have the losers as so there can be winners? Do there need to be followers, for there to be a 'leader'? What is the difference between a good leader and a bad one, moreso who decides what is good and bad? Where does the motivation come from?
No comments:
Post a Comment